Results: Group Homes *VS* Foster Homes

benidamou profile photo
benidamou

05/24/2013

5

1267

Living
1.
1.
Is it fair for siblings to be split up into different foster homes in the event of one parents death when caused by the other?
Yes
8%
107 votes
No
73%
922 votes
Undecided
18%
227 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
11 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.32% 4
normally i would say maybe not. but, whatever is emotionally going to get the kids through is the most important thing 0.08% 1
i think it would be unfair even if one parents death was not caused by the other. 0.08% 1
na 0.08% 1
depends 0.08% 1
it's unfair but may, in some cases, be unavoidable. 0.08% 1
i think is best if they can stay together but depends on circumstances 0.08% 1
not fair but might have to happen if no one can take them all 0.08% 1
2.
2.
Would it depend on the circumstances and the number of children or should that even matter?
Depends on Number of Children
16%
198 votes
Doesn't Matter How Many Children
51%
647 votes
Depends on the Circumstances
32%
401 votes
Other (please specify)
2%
21 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.47% 6
na 0.47% 6
they should not be apart brothers and sisters should stay together 0.08% 1
im sure its hard to find people willing to take two or more children. 0.08% 1
. 0.08% 1
not sure 0.08% 1
everything should be done to keep them together 0.08% 1
they should be kept together 0.08% 1
undecided 0.08% 1
other 0.08% 1
they should stay together no matter what 0.08% 1
3.
3.
Should we have more group homes for children across the US in place of foster homes just for situations like this where the children can stay together?
Yes
66%
834 votes
No
15%
193 votes
More Group Homes Would Mean More Tax Money
17%
216 votes
Other (please specify)
2%
24 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
na 0.47% 6
undecided 0.32% 4
0.32% 4
idk 0.24% 3
all types of alternatives are good, some foster homes don't work for the kids 0.08% 1
i don't know enough about this stuff to have an opinion of it. 0.08% 1
more group homes would likely mean more children that don't get the proper supervision and love needed to grow up to be a normal adult. 0.08% 1
not sure 0.08% 1
dont know 0.08% 1
unsure 0.08% 1
other 0.08% 1
4.
4.
If the oldest sibling is able and old enough to care for and support them all, should they be allowed to live together in a home of their choosing?
Only if Oldest Sibling is 18 or Older
61%
774 votes
No, They Should Have to Go Through the System Like Everyone Else
13%
168 votes
Yes, But Only if They Could Pay For the House and Not the Taxpayers
23%
287 votes
Other (please specify)
3%
38 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.55% 7
na 0.55% 7
not sure 0.32% 4
n/a 0.08% 1
n/a. 0.08% 1
if the oldest sibling is at least 16 i think they should be allowed to care for the younger ones. 0.08% 1
it should depend on the maturity of the oldest sibling and if they have any income to support everyone. 0.08% 1
not only age as a reason to allow but how responsible the oldest is 0.08% 1
i can't answer that question. 0.08% 1
other 0.08% 1
undecided 0.08% 1
depends on a lot of things ! 0.08% 1
you can't answer that question so blindly. it would totally depend on the situation 0.08% 1
... 0.08% 1
it's a lot of responsibility to give to someone who has been through a lot. i think they should be given the option and given support to be able to do so. 0.08% 1
depending on age 0.08% 1
the oldest sibling shouldn't be forced into the role of parent 0.08% 1
n 0.08% 1
if the oldest sibling is proven mentally capable then yes, even at 16 yrs old they should be given their parents social security to take care of their younger siblings. 0.08% 1
idk 0.08% 1
depends 0.08% 1
depends on the situation 0.08% 1
yes 0.08% 1

Comments