It's a 6 of one and half dozen of another question.
I think there should be a limit on how many times a man can donate. Having 100 children somewhere is not only ridiculous but it can have serious consequences if the siblings meet up and accidentally fall in love with each other. They say there is a stronger attraction between siblings who do not know each other.
I find it almost unbelievable how some cannot concieve. Shoot I have 8 siblings It wouldve been 10 of us. And I know it only takes ONE good time to pregnant. Shooot come from a fertile family tree. IM not taking any chances. All i think of is ok i want the sex but then in return a baby will come along. So let me not even do the sex
about 1 month
im assuming this to be for a woman who may not be able to get pregnant another way...the major problem here is how do you tell sumone its anonymous and then want to violate his privacy if something goes wrong
God sends everyone a help mate like Adam And Eve not Steve it not a wise thing to mix with someone genes in your dreams its not God say so hit the highway
I think it is subjective and up to whoever was saying.
Every sperm donated is a child donated in truth, but men who do this fail to realize this critical mistake. This is wrong. Why not just have a child? And also I believe once sperm is donated and passed on to a new owner, the donor should have nothing to do with the child unless a big emergency comes up that requires the donor. Still, this shouldn't even come up because guys shouldn't even donate.
it is pretty silly.. men donating sperm, women getting abortions. couples getting invitro
What a world of crazies live all over. All these people killing babies and others that don't want half of what makes a babe and both tell every one to stay OUT OF THEIR BUSINESS , until there's a problem. Then it every body as to take care of the problem and its no longer the individual problem it every one else's. ***** If you want to do something than do it, but live with the consequences! If you don't know or don't think of the side effects or consequences! Than investigate the situation then make your position But F---in know you are responsible! Not every one else. Put your self in s--- , than pull your self out of s---!
Now this is just a weird question.
I came here to say essentially the same thing user ikkinlala said. The agency should act as an agent for both parties. The person providing the sperm is doing a wonderful service for the person who wants a child but for some reason, cannot have one the "old fashioned" way. They should always have the assurance that one act of kindness will not come back to haunt them later.
A donation implies no strings attached. I hope Goodwill never calls me up about any of my jackets.
I think none
Anonymous should remain anonymous to the child and its family, but I think it would be reasonable for the agency to be allowed to contact the donor with medical questions if this becomes important.
The donor should not in any way be responsible for anything at all. Except if the child needs their DNA to help them live, and only then.
Not everyone knows their entire medical history. I think that if a person is kind enough to be a donor then they would gladly relinquish their right to privacy in a life or death case for the child. I do not think donors should, and I'm not talking about helping a friend to make a baby outside the confines of the medical establishment, be financially responsible for a child.
I would think that medical history should be a factor when donating and known up front to prevent issues later on
©2013 Tellwut - Online Surveys, Opinion Polls & Questions
| Survey FAQ's
| Contact Us
| Pricing Survey Solutions
| Terms and Conditions