Rewards
Walmart logo
Amazon logo
PayPal logo
Amazon gift card
Take surveys and collect rewards from the industry-leading e-commerce website, Amazon.com, Via "amazon gift cards". The more you take or create survey, larger the amazon gift card you earn.

Results: Since so many young children are deathly allergic to peanuts and tree nuts, should peanuts and tree nuts be banned in public schools?

Published on 09/17/2014
By: Lanie
2013
Parenting
1.
1.
Since so many young children are deathly allergic to peanuts and tree nuts, should peanuts and tree nuts be banned in public schools?
Yes
36%
733 votes
No
39%
795 votes
Undecided
24%
485 votes
Why?
  • such children should not be in schools
  • less worry
  • na
  • they shouldn't eat them
  • banning nuts will not prevent allergic reactions
  • only with younger grades
  • might as well ban everything else
  • because my kids shouldn't have to not eat what they like. now a nut free area, i do agree with
  • my grandson is allergic to peanuts...even if he doesn't have them in hand,.
  • teachers and staff should be aware and have precautions in
  • show me the statistics of all these kids dying from peanut allergies
  • because some children might like them and not be allergic.
  • f
  • just in case kids don't know
  • so no one has a serious reaction by accidentally consuming them
  • health issue
  • my kids take peanut butter sandwiches in their lunches.
  • let children wear something that let others know this child is allergic to anykind of nuts.
  • it is not fair to those who are not allergic
  • other students shouldnt be denided them
  • because it is too dangerous for children to be protected against nuts and peanuts in schools.
  • why punish the other kids?
  • dangerous
  • its the parents responsibility to inform the school about their child's allergy
  • nonsense
  • some children are allergic to everything except peanuts.
  • b
  • education
  • dangerous
  • why ban them for everyone?
  • .
  • casue they can set of child real bad if are allergic
  • safe is better then sorry
  • so no one accidently comes in contact with them
  • no need to
  • already are
  • because some people can eat them
  • 1
  • if you have the problem, deal with it
  • some kids may not know or ignore that they are allergic to peanuts
  • idk
  • not sure
  • because so many people aren't
  • because of the danger of allergys
  • uh, risk of death
  • because it is such a small number and should be addressed by individuals and not collectivelyd
  • not all children are allergic.
  • to not harm a child
  • it dosen't effect everyone
  • harmful and can beak out if a jar is opened in the same room. some are highly allergic
  • why chance it
  • na
  • too many kids allergic
  • some arent some are, the parents should warn the school before hand
  • they are banned in the schools where i live.
  • some parents dont know if their child is allergic
  • i like peanuts
  • maybe from being served in schools
  • dont know
  • safty
  • because my son can eat all that stuff.
  • because it is really harmful to some people
  • they should have to deal with it.
  • to avoid issues with allergies
  • allergies
  • to protect those that need it
  • dunno
  • wimps
  • god created them and they should not be refused unless you have an allergy to them.
  • i am one of those who is allergic and it is a constant problem
  • a single persons allergy shoul dnot affect the entiore schiool
  • xx
  • you never know what foods they are in
  • so obvioius.
  • because other people like peanut butter sbd its a good source of protein
  • most people are not allergic, so why deny the benefits of peanuts.
  • peanuts and tree nuts is good food
  • there should be a sep area for kids to eat that have the allergy
  • unsure
  • children with allergies should give diet restrictions to the school
  • cater to the majority
  • kids should be able to eat what they want.
  • it might not seem fair to the other kids to be deprived of nuts etc. but better than to see a classm
  • are there really that many?
  • na
  • allergy
  • many can have peanuts, food should be labeled for others that cannot .
  • majority rules
  • better safe
  • anaphalactic reactions can kill!!
  • we never had this issue as kids, why should be so important now
  • what about those not allergic
  • so not to kill the children
  • just in casee a hcild decides to get some
  • kids are kids and eat without thinking
  • kids should know to stay away. its not fair to other kids.
  • because it's to hard to keep up with children's allergy when they are small
  • not all children are allergic
  • would eliminate the danger
  • in canada they are banned in schools, as well as ( and this is soooo stupid) the wow butter
  • i can see peanuts yes but other things no, then your child can stay home for lunch
  • for safety
  • safety of the children
  • because young children are deathly allergic ! duh !
  • people with medical issues should learn to deal with them themselves.
  • child and teachers should be aware of problem
  • there are many other food allergies. should we ban all food in public schools?
  • na
  • they will hurt children
  • not everyone is allergic
  • you would end up banning everything
  • because
  • n/a
  • for that reason
  • kids with allergies should know to stay away from them
  • just a good idea
  • well, i assume this will be a problem for them lifelong, so they need to be educated in how to avoid
  • as its harmful to some kids
  • dangerous to the children
  • n/a
  • safer environment for those children that are severely allergic.
  • some children are allergic to other foods and need nuts in their diet
  • why punish everyone when this could be monitered.
  • why put them at risk
  • i thought they were already?
  • have a nut free zone
  • not applicable
  • parents and children are responsible for them not ingesting nuts, not the school
  • kids should be taught not to eat other kid's food so there is no risk of an allergic reaction
  • choic
  • i'm not sure that would be fair
  • i am not sure if they should or not
  • not fair for everyone else
  • eliminates potential problems
  • didn't have to deal w/that
  • not every kid is allergic to peanut butter
  • it's impossible to eliminate all allergens, so they should learn strategic coping mechanisms
  • na
  • idk
  • na
  • to save any childs life is worth the ban
  • so kids dont get sick
  • because more children are not allergic
  • ok
  • the parent should make that childs lunch is if they are allergic
  • natural selection
  • why take the chance
  • some children are very much tempted when away from home
  • so no one will die
  • equality
  • it is worth it if even one child can be saved
  • better safe than sorry.
  • they already are banned at my children's school.
  • shouldnt effect evryone
  • should there even be public schools?
  • it is harmful to the people who are allergic
  • i would really like to know why so many children are allergic to peanuts and tree nuts.
  • better to be safe than sorry
  • children with allergies shouldn't have access to them.
  • according to the health website, less than 4% of children have any allergy to peanuts at all.
  • could be accessable to children with allergies
  • it's fatal to some kids... in my sons school they are banned
  • it's not fair to the majority who aren't allergic.
  • because that infringes on the right of students who do not have allergies.
  • peanuts good
  • so it creates a more healthy.
  • deaths
  • not sure
  • this way there could never be an accident
  • kids need to be protected
  • dont seem fair yet concerned for those who could die
  • because other people like them....
  • they are too dangerous
  • to save lives
  • schools should just monitor the situation
  • because of allergies
  • why should my child have to suffer because of another's misfortune?
  • already are at schools in my county.
  • safty reasons/respect
  • need to get tuff
  • but they should definitely warn those affected.
  • many more children have no such allergy
  • its rediculous
  • they should not be banned. simply separate the kids at lunch time. others should not impose on other
  • cause some people are allergic to other food should we also ban that too?
  • health hazard
  • because peanut butter is a staple in some households
  • children know what they have allergic reaction from
  • because some students having allergy to nuts.
  • idk
  • why punish the kids who can eat these nuts?
  • to ensure safety
  • don't eat them if you are allergic, ffs i'm not depriving my child of food
  • my nephew won't eat anything but peanut butter sandwiches
  • don't punish everyone
  • n/a
  • just in case
  • to be safe
  • why should others have to give up things they like
  • don't have children
  • public schools does'nt know about your child with allergic to peanuts
  • n/a
  • not worth the risk.
  • students need to be properly educated
  • cause they're healthy if kids arent allergic and provide proper nutrients for kids who are vegetaria
  • na
  • niys
  • why risk it?
  • cross contamination
  • you can't ban just one food because there are other foods kids are allergic to.
  • don't want to kill the students
  • because the slighest slip up of a slip up within the school puts the child at risk of a fatal episod
  • because when your child has to take his/her lunch, pb sandwiches might be all some parents can affor
  • don't punish everybody, kids need to learn to deal with this.
  • the child should know by time they go to school what to avoid
  • they can have designated areas for peanut free
  • to save medical problems in school
  • because some like them
  • very dangerous
  • i know an autistic child that will only eat peanut butter sandwiches. can we ban his lunch?
  • because it's not fair to the kids who aren't allergic to nuts
  • build up tolerances
  • it's not really that many kids, the nuts are very nutricious.
  • its not fair for the outher kids. she should be tought to wash there hands
  • safety
  • too many people allergic
  • why should all kids be punished because a few can't eat something? needs to be clearly labeled.
  • the allergies
  • nut allergies account for about 2% of allergies.
  • n/a
  • not that many are 'deathly'allergic
  • na
  • they usually are, anyway.
  • nuts and especially peanut butter is a staple for many children and they should be able to have that
  • no
  • so kids do not get sick.
  • they should be banned in the classroom the child is in.
  • why punish all for a few
  • just thesmell of food can make someone sick
  • na
  • what about the children that will only eat nut foods?
  • my sister in law's nephew is allergic to peanuts, and even the slightest contact could hurt him!
  • na
  • the parents need to educate their children about the things they are allergic to.
  • there are not so many.
  • so that accidents like this can happen to children it is very scary for a child to go thru!!
  • no reason
  • na
  • someones gonna die
  • safety
  • they already are!
  • the risk
  • because you would not want someone's child to die from this
  • unless they're forced down their throats by another kids, they would never come into contact.
  • to avoid a serious situation.
  • because of allergies
  • i guess because of those that are deathly allergic.
  • because its not worth the risk
  • you do not what child may have an allergic. to ensure the safety of all children all peanuts a
  • because if they aren't a child could die and the school would be responsible for their death
  • other people have rights too, and peanut butter is cheap and nutritious.
  • health issues.
  • is too big a risk for some kids
  • these allergies can be severe and life threatening
  • it would take away from other children
  • just don't allow children to food.
  • a child needs to be taught asap what they can never have.
  • not everybody is the same.
  • as soon as the parents know about the allergy they should be taught to be alert and vigilant in rega
  • there are a lot of poor families that get it free at pantries & from wic
  • safe
  • i don't know enough about the arguments in favor or against such a measure.
  • it is not fair to the other children
  • people should be able to eat what they want
  • no
  • why not let the allergic kids ieat in their own cafeteria
  • chance of coming in contact
  • elemetary schools only, just when child is too young to notice or question a product
  • they no they should\nt eat them the allergents
  • zzzzzzzz
  • should not take unnecssary risk
  • their are alot of things with out them made at places that use them in other things
  • not worth a person dying over a peanut
  • my daughter is but others should be able to eat them.
  • the children with allergys must be protected
  • save lives
  • they do not need to be there
  • not everyone should have to give up something for a few.
  • because if you're gonna ban public consumption of foods people are allergic to; start with seafood!!
  • why should the non allergic kids be denied the access to food?
  • some believe that they can give their children those things because it won't affect other children.
  • to popular in foods
  • cause they cause death in children!
  • there is too much risk of their coming in contact with nuts
  • young children who are allergic can just stay away from those whom eat them
  • a lot of children don't eat meat, so peanut butter is their main protien source.
  • kids could die or get very sick by accident.
  • only a minority of children are allergic
  • i dont know
  • not fair to other children. schools can have a designated area for peanut free students
  • because if banned all food children are allergic to we wouldn't have any food at schools.
  • just find out who can not have them
  • nobody needs to have nuts and peanuts in school and i'd rather my grandson not die
  • they should not be used in the kitchen, but other children should be able to use them.
  • i'm allergic to peanuts and i like to be in an allergy free environment
  • n/a
  • not sure
  • well, if so many are allergic why put kids at risk?
  • it's not fair to those without allergies,
  • what if they were allergic to ohter things would they be banded
  • better to be safe than sorry
  • to keep the kids safe
  • when nutty buddies (ice cream) were banned in elementry school, a lot of kids were sad.
  • get homeschooled.
  • not everybody is allergic and the ones who are know to stay away
  • it is up to the parents to educate thier children to stay away from what they are allergic to.
  • cant hurt
  • some can eat it..
  • for safety reasons
  • it takes away other children's rights to have them
  • .
  • if they dont eat them they should be fine
  • this is why files should be thorough. all doctor/health related paperwork should be up to date.
  • why should that child suffer because somebody wanted peanuts.
Other Answers Percentage Votes
na 0.55% 11
n/a 0.30% 6
idk 0.15% 3
not sure 0.15% 3
dangerous 0.10% 2
. 0.10% 2
better to be safe than sorry 0.10% 2
because of allergies 0.10% 2
safety 0.10% 2
no 0.10% 2
such children should not be in schools 0.05% 1
less worry 0.05% 1
they shouldn't eat them 0.05% 1
banning nuts will not prevent allergic reactions 0.05% 1
only with younger grades 0.05% 1
might as well ban everything else 0.05% 1
because my kids shouldn't have to not eat what they like. now a nut free area, i do agree with 0.05% 1
my grandson is allergic to peanuts...even if he doesn't have them in hand,. 0.05% 1
teachers and staff should be aware and have precautions in 0.05% 1
show me the statistics of all these kids dying from peanut allergies 0.05% 1
because some children might like them and not be allergic. 0.05% 1
f 0.05% 1
just in case kids don't know 0.05% 1
so no one has a serious reaction by accidentally consuming them 0.05% 1
health issue 0.05% 1
my kids take peanut butter sandwiches in their lunches. 0.05% 1
let children wear something that let others know this child is allergic to anykind of nuts. 0.05% 1
it is not fair to those who are not allergic 0.05% 1
other students shouldnt be denided them 0.05% 1
because it is too dangerous for children to be protected against nuts and peanuts in schools. 0.05% 1
why punish the other kids? 0.05% 1
its the parents responsibility to inform the school about their child's allergy 0.05% 1
nonsense 0.05% 1
some children are allergic to everything except peanuts. 0.05% 1
b 0.05% 1
education 0.05% 1
why ban them for everyone? 0.05% 1
casue they can set of child real bad if are allergic 0.05% 1
safe is better then sorry 0.05% 1
so no one accidently comes in contact with them 0.05% 1
no need to 0.05% 1
already are 0.05% 1
because some people can eat them 0.05% 1
1 0.05% 1
if you have the problem, deal with it 0.05% 1
some kids may not know or ignore that they are allergic to peanuts 0.05% 1
because so many people aren't 0.05% 1
because of the danger of allergys 0.05% 1
uh, risk of death 0.05% 1
because it is such a small number and should be addressed by individuals and not collectivelyd 0.05% 1
not all children are allergic. 0.05% 1
to not harm a child 0.05% 1
it dosen't effect everyone 0.05% 1
harmful and can beak out if a jar is opened in the same room. some are highly allergic 0.05% 1
why chance it 0.05% 1
too many kids allergic 0.05% 1
some arent some are, the parents should warn the school before hand 0.05% 1
they are banned in the schools where i live. 0.05% 1
some parents dont know if their child is allergic 0.05% 1
i like peanuts 0.05% 1
maybe from being served in schools 0.05% 1
dont know 0.05% 1
safty 0.05% 1
because my son can eat all that stuff. 0.05% 1
because it is really harmful to some people 0.05% 1
they should have to deal with it. 0.05% 1
to avoid issues with allergies 0.05% 1
allergies 0.05% 1
to protect those that need it 0.05% 1
dunno 0.05% 1
wimps 0.05% 1
god created them and they should not be refused unless you have an allergy to them. 0.05% 1
i am one of those who is allergic and it is a constant problem 0.05% 1
a single persons allergy shoul dnot affect the entiore schiool 0.05% 1
xx 0.05% 1
you never know what foods they are in 0.05% 1
so obvioius. 0.05% 1
because other people like peanut butter sbd its a good source of protein 0.05% 1
most people are not allergic, so why deny the benefits of peanuts. 0.05% 1
peanuts and tree nuts is good food 0.05% 1
there should be a sep area for kids to eat that have the allergy 0.05% 1
unsure 0.05% 1
children with allergies should give diet restrictions to the school 0.05% 1
cater to the majority 0.05% 1
kids should be able to eat what they want. 0.05% 1
it might not seem fair to the other kids to be deprived of nuts etc. but better than to see a classm 0.05% 1
are there really that many? 0.05% 1
allergy 0.05% 1
many can have peanuts, food should be labeled for others that cannot . 0.05% 1
majority rules 0.05% 1
better safe 0.05% 1
anaphalactic reactions can kill!! 0.05% 1
we never had this issue as kids, why should be so important now 0.05% 1
what about those not allergic 0.05% 1
so not to kill the children 0.05% 1
just in casee a hcild decides to get some 0.05% 1
kids are kids and eat without thinking 0.05% 1
kids should know to stay away. its not fair to other kids. 0.05% 1
because it's to hard to keep up with children's allergy when they are small 0.05% 1
not all children are allergic 0.05% 1
would eliminate the danger 0.05% 1
in canada they are banned in schools, as well as ( and this is soooo stupid) the wow butter 0.05% 1
i can see peanuts yes but other things no, then your child can stay home for lunch 0.05% 1
for safety 0.05% 1
safety of the children 0.05% 1
because young children are deathly allergic ! duh ! 0.05% 1
people with medical issues should learn to deal with them themselves. 0.05% 1
child and teachers should be aware of problem 0.05% 1
there are many other food allergies. should we ban all food in public schools? 0.05% 1
they will hurt children 0.05% 1
not everyone is allergic 0.05% 1
you would end up banning everything 0.05% 1
because 0.05% 1
for that reason 0.05% 1
kids with allergies should know to stay away from them 0.05% 1
just a good idea 0.05% 1
well, i assume this will be a problem for them lifelong, so they need to be educated in how to avoid 0.05% 1
as its harmful to some kids 0.05% 1
dangerous to the children 0.05% 1
safer environment for those children that are severely allergic. 0.05% 1
some children are allergic to other foods and need nuts in their diet 0.05% 1
why punish everyone when this could be monitered. 0.05% 1
why put them at risk 0.05% 1
i thought they were already? 0.05% 1
have a nut free zone 0.05% 1
not applicable 0.05% 1
parents and children are responsible for them not ingesting nuts, not the school 0.05% 1
kids should be taught not to eat other kid's food so there is no risk of an allergic reaction 0.05% 1
choic 0.05% 1
i'm not sure that would be fair 0.05% 1
i am not sure if they should or not 0.05% 1
not fair for everyone else 0.05% 1
eliminates potential problems 0.05% 1
didn't have to deal w/that 0.05% 1
not every kid is allergic to peanut butter 0.05% 1
it's impossible to eliminate all allergens, so they should learn strategic coping mechanisms 0.05% 1
to save any childs life is worth the ban 0.05% 1
so kids dont get sick 0.05% 1
because more children are not allergic 0.05% 1
ok 0.05% 1
the parent should make that childs lunch is if they are allergic 0.05% 1
natural selection 0.05% 1
why take the chance 0.05% 1
some children are very much tempted when away from home 0.05% 1
so no one will die 0.05% 1
equality 0.05% 1
it is worth it if even one child can be saved 0.05% 1
better safe than sorry. 0.05% 1
they already are banned at my children's school. 0.05% 1
shouldnt effect evryone 0.05% 1
should there even be public schools? 0.05% 1
it is harmful to the people who are allergic 0.05% 1
i would really like to know why so many children are allergic to peanuts and tree nuts. 0.05% 1
children with allergies shouldn't have access to them. 0.05% 1
according to the health website, less than 4% of children have any allergy to peanuts at all. 0.05% 1
could be accessable to children with allergies 0.05% 1
it's fatal to some kids... in my sons school they are banned 0.05% 1
it's not fair to the majority who aren't allergic. 0.05% 1
because that infringes on the right of students who do not have allergies. 0.05% 1
peanuts good 0.05% 1
so it creates a more healthy. 0.05% 1
deaths 0.05% 1
this way there could never be an accident 0.05% 1
kids need to be protected 0.05% 1
dont seem fair yet concerned for those who could die 0.05% 1
because other people like them.... 0.05% 1
they are too dangerous 0.05% 1
to save lives 0.05% 1
schools should just monitor the situation 0.05% 1
why should my child have to suffer because of another's misfortune? 0.05% 1
already are at schools in my county. 0.05% 1
safty reasons/respect 0.05% 1
need to get tuff 0.05% 1
but they should definitely warn those affected. 0.05% 1
many more children have no such allergy 0.05% 1
its rediculous 0.05% 1
they should not be banned. simply separate the kids at lunch time. others should not impose on other 0.05% 1
cause some people are allergic to other food should we also ban that too? 0.05% 1
health hazard 0.05% 1
because peanut butter is a staple in some households 0.05% 1
children know what they have allergic reaction from 0.05% 1
because some students having allergy to nuts. 0.05% 1
why punish the kids who can eat these nuts? 0.05% 1
to ensure safety 0.05% 1
don't eat them if you are allergic, ffs i'm not depriving my child of food 0.05% 1
my nephew won't eat anything but peanut butter sandwiches 0.05% 1
don't punish everyone 0.05% 1
just in case 0.05% 1
to be safe 0.05% 1
why should others have to give up things they like 0.05% 1
don't have children 0.05% 1
public schools does'nt know about your child with allergic to peanuts 0.05% 1
not worth the risk. 0.05% 1
students need to be properly educated 0.05% 1
cause they're healthy if kids arent allergic and provide proper nutrients for kids who are vegetaria 0.05% 1
niys 0.05% 1
why risk it? 0.05% 1
cross contamination 0.05% 1
you can't ban just one food because there are other foods kids are allergic to. 0.05% 1
don't want to kill the students 0.05% 1
because the slighest slip up of a slip up within the school puts the child at risk of a fatal episod 0.05% 1
because when your child has to take his/her lunch, pb sandwiches might be all some parents can affor 0.05% 1
don't punish everybody, kids need to learn to deal with this. 0.05% 1
the child should know by time they go to school what to avoid 0.05% 1
they can have designated areas for peanut free 0.05% 1
to save medical problems in school 0.05% 1
because some like them 0.05% 1
very dangerous 0.05% 1
i know an autistic child that will only eat peanut butter sandwiches. can we ban his lunch? 0.05% 1
because it's not fair to the kids who aren't allergic to nuts 0.05% 1
build up tolerances 0.05% 1
it's not really that many kids, the nuts are very nutricious. 0.05% 1
its not fair for the outher kids. she should be tought to wash there hands 0.05% 1
too many people allergic 0.05% 1
why should all kids be punished because a few can't eat something? needs to be clearly labeled. 0.05% 1
the allergies 0.05% 1
nut allergies account for about 2% of allergies. 0.05% 1
not that many are 'deathly'allergic 0.05% 1
they usually are, anyway. 0.05% 1
nuts and especially peanut butter is a staple for many children and they should be able to have that 0.05% 1
so kids do not get sick. 0.05% 1
they should be banned in the classroom the child is in. 0.05% 1
why punish all for a few 0.05% 1
just thesmell of food can make someone sick 0.05% 1
what about the children that will only eat nut foods? 0.05% 1
my sister in law's nephew is allergic to peanuts, and even the slightest contact could hurt him! 0.05% 1
the parents need to educate their children about the things they are allergic to. 0.05% 1
there are not so many. 0.05% 1
so that accidents like this can happen to children it is very scary for a child to go thru!! 0.05% 1
no reason 0.05% 1
someones gonna die 0.05% 1
they already are! 0.05% 1
the risk 0.05% 1
because you would not want someone's child to die from this 0.05% 1
unless they're forced down their throats by another kids, they would never come into contact. 0.05% 1
to avoid a serious situation. 0.05% 1
i guess because of those that are deathly allergic. 0.05% 1
because its not worth the risk 0.05% 1
you do not what child may have an allergic. to ensure the safety of all children all peanuts a 0.05% 1
because if they aren't a child could die and the school would be responsible for their death 0.05% 1
other people have rights too, and peanut butter is cheap and nutritious. 0.05% 1
health issues. 0.05% 1
is too big a risk for some kids 0.05% 1
these allergies can be severe and life threatening 0.05% 1
it would take away from other children 0.05% 1
just don't allow children to food. 0.05% 1
a child needs to be taught asap what they can never have. 0.05% 1
not everybody is the same. 0.05% 1
as soon as the parents know about the allergy they should be taught to be alert and vigilant in rega 0.05% 1
there are a lot of poor families that get it free at pantries & from wic 0.05% 1
safe 0.05% 1
i don't know enough about the arguments in favor or against such a measure. 0.05% 1
it is not fair to the other children 0.05% 1
people should be able to eat what they want 0.05% 1
why not let the allergic kids ieat in their own cafeteria 0.05% 1
chance of coming in contact 0.05% 1
elemetary schools only, just when child is too young to notice or question a product 0.05% 1
they no they should\nt eat them the allergents 0.05% 1
zzzzzzzz 0.05% 1
should not take unnecssary risk 0.05% 1
their are alot of things with out them made at places that use them in other things 0.05% 1
not worth a person dying over a peanut 0.05% 1
my daughter is but others should be able to eat them. 0.05% 1
the children with allergys must be protected 0.05% 1
save lives 0.05% 1
they do not need to be there 0.05% 1
not everyone should have to give up something for a few. 0.05% 1
because if you're gonna ban public consumption of foods people are allergic to; start with seafood!! 0.05% 1
why should the non allergic kids be denied the access to food? 0.05% 1
some believe that they can give their children those things because it won't affect other children. 0.05% 1
to popular in foods 0.05% 1
cause they cause death in children! 0.05% 1
there is too much risk of their coming in contact with nuts 0.05% 1
young children who are allergic can just stay away from those whom eat them 0.05% 1
a lot of children don't eat meat, so peanut butter is their main protien source. 0.05% 1
kids could die or get very sick by accident. 0.05% 1
only a minority of children are allergic 0.05% 1
i dont know 0.05% 1
not fair to other children. schools can have a designated area for peanut free students 0.05% 1
because if banned all food children are allergic to we wouldn't have any food at schools. 0.05% 1
just find out who can not have them 0.05% 1
nobody needs to have nuts and peanuts in school and i'd rather my grandson not die 0.05% 1
they should not be used in the kitchen, but other children should be able to use them. 0.05% 1
i'm allergic to peanuts and i like to be in an allergy free environment 0.05% 1
well, if so many are allergic why put kids at risk? 0.05% 1
it's not fair to those without allergies, 0.05% 1
what if they were allergic to ohter things would they be banded 0.05% 1
to keep the kids safe 0.05% 1
when nutty buddies (ice cream) were banned in elementry school, a lot of kids were sad. 0.05% 1
get homeschooled. 0.05% 1
not everybody is allergic and the ones who are know to stay away 0.05% 1
it is up to the parents to educate thier children to stay away from what they are allergic to. 0.05% 1
cant hurt 0.05% 1
some can eat it.. 0.05% 1
for safety reasons 0.05% 1
it takes away other children's rights to have them 0.05% 1
if they dont eat them they should be fine 0.05% 1
this is why files should be thorough. all doctor/health related paperwork should be up to date. 0.05% 1
why should that child suffer because somebody wanted peanuts. 0.05% 1
COMMENTS