Results: Doing double duty

PinkAnts profile photo
ptajuggalette

12/07/2013

8

1606

Technology
1.
1.
Copenhagen Trash Incinerator Doubles as Ski Resort Name: Amager Bakke (Amager Hill) Budget: $670 million Completion: Spring 2017 Input: 400,000 tons of waste per year Output: Heating for 160,000 households and electricity for 62,500 households The slope: The rooftop ski runs, totaling 11,000 square meters, will be a mix of natural and man-made snow. The visitors: The roof will slope all the way to the ground, so hikers can enjoy the ascent. Have you heard about this project?
Yes
4%
66 votes
No
78%
1255 votes
Undecided
6%
91 votes
Not Applicable
12%
194 votes
2.
2.
What are your overall feelings about this idea?
Great idea
17%
272 votes
It has its pros and cons
23%
375 votes
Not sure
50%
805 votes
Thumbs down
8%
135 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
19 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.31% 5
n/a 0.19% 3
na 0.12% 2
dont care 0.12% 2
great but ugly needs a better profile 0.06% 1
other 0.06% 1
don't care! 0.06% 1
don't ski, don't care 0.06% 1
need more information 0.06% 1
i don't ski 0.06% 1
not sure, information was presented poorlly and confusingly 0.06% 1
3.
3.
Are there any structures in your area that do double duty?
Yes
5%
79 votes
No
50%
811 votes
Undecided
28%
451 votes
Not Applicable
17%
265 votes
4.
4.
Do you foresee any safety hazards in regards to using a trash incinerator as the foundation for a ski resort??
Yes
30%
482 votes
No
16%
262 votes
Undecided
36%
585 votes
Not Applicable
17%
277 votes
5.
5.
If you are in a non-snow area, would you visit a resort like this?
Yes
13%
208 votes
No
34%
543 votes
Undecided
25%
398 votes
Not Applicable
28%
457 votes
6.
6.
What do you like best: the incerator technology (a new breed of waste-to-energy plant) or the "ski resort on top" technology?
The new breed of waste-to-energy plant
21%
330 votes
The ski resort
7%
117 votes
Both
20%
316 votes
Neither
18%
293 votes
N/A
34%
547 votes
Other (please specify)
0%
3 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
not sure 0.12% 2
dont know enough or understand enough to give a good answer 0.06% 1

Comments