Join the community
Make friends, be an influencer, and earn rewards. Join now for free:
or
Already have an account ?
Login
38+ Million
Surveys Completed
2,601,661
Members
We are currently only available in USA and Canada. We will notify as we go live in other countries!
Be Heard, Be Social, Earn Rewards
Take Surveys
Build your profile and get matched to high-reward surveys
Earn Rewards
Complete surveys and earn virtual points
Get Paid
We've paid out over $3 Million in PayPal and gift cards to members
2. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, argues that the bill, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, violates constitutional protections of free speech. The suit calls the law an "unprecedented violation" of the First Amendment. "For the first time in history, Congress has enacted a law that subjects a single, named speech platform to a permanent, nationwide ban," TikTok wrote in the lawsuit, "and bars every American from participating in a unique online community with more than 1 billion people worldwide." Do you think TikTok has a solid argument against this ban?
3. The company argues that invoking national security concerns is not a sufficient reason for restricting free speech, and that the burden is on the federal government to prove that this restriction is warranted. It has not met that burden, the lawsuit stated. In your opinion, are national security concerns a sufficient reason for restricting free speech?
