Results: Supreme Court says Maine cannot exclude religious schools from tuition assistance programs

The case involved two Maine families who wanted to enroll their children at a private Christian school that offers religious teaching, but were denied tuition assistance from the state. Maine, a largely rural state that does not have public schools in some areas, has a program that allows public funds to cover students' tuition fees at nearby private schools, so long as they are "nonsectarian." The families appealed the state's decision, arguing that the rule is discriminatory and violates their First Amendment right to exercise religion freely, otherwise known as the free exercise clause. Do you agree with the Supreme Court's ruling to allow tuition assistance for religious schools?

CNN writes: The 6-3 ruling is the latest move by the conservative court to expand religious liberty rights and bring more religion into public life, a trend bolstered by the addition of three of former President Donald Trump's nominees. Do you agree with this statement that the Supreme Court is trying to bring more religion into public life?

Presently, Catholic schools in Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and all three territories are publicly funded. At the time of Confederation in 1867, the right for Catholic schools to exist and be funded was written into section 93 of Canada's Constitution. Do you agree with public funds going to religious schools?