Rewards
Walmart logo
Amazon logo
PayPal logo
Amazon gift card
Take surveys and collect rewards from the industry-leading e-commerce website, Amazon.com, Via "amazon gift cards". The more you take or create survey, larger the amazon gift card you earn.

Results: Debunking myths about American History (Part 1 of 2)

Published on 10/28/2015
By: LBP
1651
Living
1.
1.
When it comes to history, the stories we learn in history books are generally factual and accurate. But that's not always the case. History has been written and rewritten throughout the years. American history is rife with half-truths, embellishments, and outright myths. Many of these myths are taught to us in our earliest years, cementing their place in our minds and textbooks. Even with a few witnesses that were watching a situation at the same time, we get different versions. When a story is being told many times it starts to have variations from the original story. Do you think your history classes were accurate enough, based on fact, not myths?
When it comes to history, the stories we learn in history books are generally factual and accurate. But that's not always the case. History has been written and rewritten throughout the years. American history is rife with half-truths, embellishments, and outright myths. Many of these myths are taught to us in our earliest years, cementing their place in our minds and textbooks. Even with a few witnesses that were watching a situation at the same time, we get different versions. When a story is being told many times it starts to have variations from the original story. Do you think your history classes were accurate enough, based on fact, not myths?
Yes, they were 100% facts
7%
108 votes
There were facts and partial truths, or partial views of what could have been the truth back then
29%
484 votes
Most of what is taught at school is facts, but there are some details that change depending on the author.
23%
381 votes
Many of the absolutely true facts I´ve learned as a kid were not reflecting what really happened
17%
282 votes
I don´t care about history.
21%
349 votes
Other (please specify)
3%
47 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
1.09% 18
n/a 0.24% 4
na 0.18% 3
history is always written from someone's own context or viewpoint 0.06% 1
who knows 0.06% 1
the real truth has not been told 0.06% 1
"history is always told by the winners..." 0.06% 1
uncertain 0.06% 1
too many moons ago to remember 0.06% 1
i know not everything i taught was accurate, but i was taught canadian history. 0.06% 1
considering much of it was before i was born i don't know 0.06% 1
gna 0.06% 1
none true now in school 0.06% 1
i used to love histoy but since obama became president i am not sure how much history i believe with all the lies that are going to end up in the future history books to make him even an ok president 0.06% 1
not sure 0.06% 1
i don't know 0.06% 1
it was one big white history hijacking. lies. 0.06% 1
only taught the american view of world history 0.06% 1
it's not accurate, and it continues to be rewritten. 0.06% 1
when it comes to african slavery it was allllll fiction. mcgraww-hill's books printed lies. 0.06% 1
hope they were facts 0.06% 1
it's all political now 0.06% 1
other 0.06% 1
mu 0.06% 1
tldr 0.06% 1
2.
2.
Let's check some common myths. Here goes the first one: The myth indicates the Wild West was murderously violent, as cowboys, vigilantes, sheriffs and Native Americans rustled for land and respect on the frontier. The truth seems to be that though the idea of dueling cowboys and revolver-toting criminals in the plains has been popular since the gold rush, these stories were usually anecdotic and greatly exaggerated - more about building legend than reporting fact. Bank robberies took place only an estimated 12 times total on the frontier from 1859 to 1900, and murder was just as uncommon: the average number of frontier town murders was 1.5 per year. The fabled shootout at the OK Corral had a body count of three. Guns of the time were highly inaccurate, and settlers were more interested in cooperation than consternation. It seems that the criminals of today's world would make Billy the Kid run for the hills. What do you think?
Let's check some common myths. Here goes the first one: The myth indicates the Wild West was murderously violent, as cowboys, vigilantes, sheriffs and Native Americans rustled for land and respect on the frontier. The truth seems to be that though the idea of dueling cowboys and revolver-toting criminals in the plains has been popular since the gold rush, these stories were usually anecdotic and greatly exaggerated - more about building legend than reporting fact. Bank robberies took place only an estimated 12 times total on the frontier from 1859 to 1900, and murder was just as uncommon: the average number of frontier town murders was 1.5 per year. The fabled shootout at the OK Corral had a body count of three. Guns of the time were highly inaccurate, and settlers were more interested in cooperation than consternation. It seems that the criminals of today's world would make Billy the Kid run for the hills. What do you think?
The Wild West was a daily shootout
10%
157 votes
The Wild West was not a daily shootout
40%
659 votes
I don´t know
49%
812 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
23 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.55% 9
na 0.18% 3
sounds accurate 0.06% 1
i agree, 0.06% 1
this world is so evil, the criminals of today are worse than ever. 0.06% 1
i don't think everything got reported back then either, but yeah, i'm sure some is exaggeration. 0.06% 1
how do we know your facts are correct? what is your source of this information? 0.06% 1
fun movies to watch 0.06% 1
strainous 0.06% 1
there are probably misleading areas. but as far as the native americans are concerned they were cheated out of land that they lived off of and put where no one else would have dared lived. desolation was their lively hood. 0.06% 1
these "facts" are cherry-picked to support the author's notion. 0.06% 1
tldr 0.06% 1
na missing 0.06% 1
3.
3.
This one will be a bit more controversial. The myth says that American might brought about the end of the Third Reich and World War II. The truth seems to be that Hollywood films, comic books and history classes like to paint America as the savior of Europe during World War II, but, like it or not, that title should probably belong to the Soviet Union. Despite a non-aggression pact, Hitler began an invasion of the USSR in 1941 and over 80% of Germany's casualties, along with massive amounts of war supplies and materials, took place on this front. Meanwhile, the U.S. and the U.K. argued over and delayed the opening of a second front until June of 1944. By then, the brutal eastern assault had essentially broken the back of the Axis powers. The added pressure of the western front hastened the demise of the Nazis, but it was by no means the deciding factor. What do you think?
This one will be a bit more controversial. The myth says that American might brought about the end of the Third Reich and World War II. The truth seems to be that Hollywood films, comic books and history classes like to paint America as the savior of Europe during World War II, but, like it or not, that title should probably belong to the Soviet Union. Despite a non-aggression pact, Hitler began an invasion of the USSR in 1941 and over 80% of Germany's casualties, along with massive amounts of war supplies and materials, took place on this front. Meanwhile, the U.S. and the U.K. argued over and delayed the opening of a second front until June of 1944. By then, the brutal eastern assault had essentially broken the back of the Axis powers. The added pressure of the western front hastened the demise of the Nazis, but it was by no means the deciding factor. What do you think?
The US was responsible for winning World War II in Europe
19%
308 votes
The US was not responsible for winning World War II in Europe
22%
364 votes
I don´t know
56%
926 votes
Other (please specify)
3%
53 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.73% 12
na 0.18% 3
all allied forces contributed to the end of the war. 0.06% 1
group effort 0.06% 1
everyone helped - all the allied countries were badly needed 0.06% 1
winning world war ii was a joint effort between several nations 0.06% 1
again, where are your facts being presented from? 0.06% 1
the us came late but all sides helped 0.06% 1
a bit of all of them? 0.06% 1
us won war in asia 0.06% 1
joint effort 0.06% 1
i think we were helpful in ending the war 0.06% 1
na missing 0.06% 1
really?! just the us?! 0.06% 1
i think the us helped in the winning of world war ii. i just think the movies that are about the war only portray the american side ofnthe warm and fail to make much mention about the other countries involved. and people get the wrong idea. 0.06% 1
no one of us could have done it alone 0.06% 1
hitler taking over from his generals was the reason nazi germany fell. german forces had to be held in reserve against the western allies on the atlantic wall and in italy. the afrika corps, under erwin rommell, was never supplied. 0.06% 1
team work 0.06% 1
both 0.06% 1
partly true, there were allies 0.06% 1
the us certainly did its part 0.06% 1
the us bought russia the time they needed and supplied much of the materiel that kept them in the war. 0.06% 1
every ally during wwii played their part in winning wwii. 0.06% 1
true, and russia has looking for pay back ever since. 0.06% 1
a combination.....no 1 could have done it alone. 0.06% 1
canada 0.06% 1
you're forgetting lend-lease. the european allies were the ones who directly weakened the axis, they could not have done so without the huge amount of supplies sent by the united states. 0.06% 1
the us along with her alies had a hand in winning wwii 0.06% 1
they helped win the war 0.06% 1
the us joining wwii later in the game gave those who had been at war for several years fresh reinforcements which had a psychological effect of the allies and the enemy. so they helped. 0.06% 1
the us helped, but russia, and hitler's own ineptitude, were the deciding factors. 0.06% 1
if the us had not entered into the war, hitler would have won. 0.06% 1
our country usa... we rejoice the affirmation of violence was stopped 0.06% 1
i think both were responsible, but that russia's extreme involvement definitely should be written into the us history books. they were the first enemy the germans couldn't just invade and conquer, which definitely took germany aback. 0.06% 1
canada came and saved your asses 0.06% 1
a little of both. 0.06% 1
n/a 0.06% 1
all armies had an effect 0.06% 1
they were partially responsible along with the other allies. 0.06% 1
it was the combination of both fronts. if not both no win war 0.06% 1
4.
4.
The myth says the severely under-matched Texans stationed at the Alamo in 1836 died fighting for their rights. The truth seems to be that the Texans were not fighting for freedom, but to maintain their slave-trade. In 1830, a new Mexican edict officially outlawed slavery and U.S. immigration in Texas. The 30,000 Texans living in the area (compared to only several thousand Mexicans) were outraged, leading to a revolt to make Texas an independent nation. General Santa Anna led the victory against the undermanned and understocked Alamo mission, which became a rallying cry for the rest of the Texan army. When Santa Anna was forced to surrender in April 1836, the Republic of Texas was born. Texas would then enter the U.S. as a slave state. What do you think?
The myth says the severely under-matched Texans stationed at the Alamo in 1836 died fighting for their rights. The truth seems to be that the Texans were not fighting for freedom, but to maintain their slave-trade. In 1830, a new Mexican edict officially outlawed slavery and U.S. immigration in Texas. The 30,000 Texans living in the area (compared to only several thousand Mexicans) were outraged, leading to a revolt to make Texas an independent nation. General Santa Anna led the victory against the undermanned and understocked Alamo mission, which became a rallying cry for the rest of the Texan army. When Santa Anna was forced to surrender in April 1836, the Republic of Texas was born. Texas would then enter the U.S. as a slave state. What do you think?
Texans died at the Alamo in the name of freedom
19%
315 votes
Texans did not die at the Alamo in the name of freedom
17%
282 votes
I don´t know
62%
1028 votes
Other (please specify)
2%
26 votes
Other Answers Percentage Votes
0.73% 12
na 0.18% 3
sounds accurate 0.06% 1
there were survivors executed by santa ana afterwards 0.06% 1
it was more complex than either answer 0.06% 1
the confrontation was finally at hand, there was to much wrong, no peace. 0.06% 1
n/a 0.06% 1
a little of both. 0.06% 1
as usual, the answer is most likely more complex than what is presented 0.06% 1
it's been so long, would have to go back and study again. 0.06% 1
prbably a combination 0.06% 1
a bit of both 0.06% 1
na missing 0.06% 1
COMMENTS