Results: Greenpeace Founder: Global Warming Hoax Pushed by Corrupt Scientists 'Hooked on Government Grants'

Moore explained how fear and guilt are leveraged by proponents of climate change: Fear has been used all through history to gain control of people's minds and wallets and all else, and the climate catastrophe is strictly a fear campaign — well, fear and guilt — you're afraid you're killing your children because you're driving them in your SUV and emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and you feel guilty for doing that. There's no stronger motivation than those two. Have you felt guilty for the part you've been told that you play in the "climate change" problem?

Scientists are co-opted and corrupted by politicians and bureaucracies invested in advancing the narrative of "climate change" in order to further centralize political power and control, explained Moore. Do you believe scientific studies are sometimes swayed to support certain political leanings (depending on where the funding is coming from)?

Moore noted how "green" companies parasitize taxpayers via favorable regulations and subsidies ostensibly justified by the aforementioned narrative's claimed threats, all while enjoying propagandistic protection across news media" Does it anger you that facts are manipulated (and such actions are protected by the media) to promote support for "political fads" like climate change?

And so you've got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You've got the media echo chamber — fake news — repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they're killing their children. And then you've got the green politicians who are buying scientists with government money to produce fear for them in the form of scientific-looking materials. And then you've got the green businesses, the rent-seekers, and the crony capitalists who are taking advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs, and government mandates requiring their technologies to make a fortune on this. And then, of course, you've got the scientists who are willingly, they're basically hooked on government grants. Does it anger you to know that taxpayer's money is going toward funding such manipulative news like this?

When they talk about the 99 percent consensus [among scientists] on climate change, that's a completely ridiculous and false number. But most of the scientists — put it in quotes, scientists — who are pushing this catastrophic theory are getting paid by public money, they are not being paid by General Electric or Dupont or 3M to do this research, where private companies expect to get something useful from their research that might produce a better product and make them a profit in the end because people want it — build a better mousetrap type of idea. But most of what these so-called scientists are doing is simply producing more fear so that politicians can use it to control people's minds and get their votes because some of the people are convinced, 'Oh, this politician can save my kid from certain doom.' Did you ever think that the 'scientists' quoted in support or denial of such things might be employed by (and expected to construct their findings in support of) political organizations and those that would benefit from their 'scientific evidence'?

We live in a society driven by social media. News reports are frequently shared before (if at all) any examination into the legitimacy of the facts. It is therefore understandable that certain political affiliations would use this process to spread "news" to create fear and generate support (financial or otherwise). If you see a report on something (via Facebook or televised news), are you likely to believe it (if it looks legitimate enough) before looking into it to see if it is actually true?