Results for - The topic is Climate Change and Malaria. Malaria has plagued human for 1,000s of years at a huge misery and economic cost. The # of people suffering from malaria ranges from 2 - 30 million per year and global warming & climate change may make it worse.

2,377 voters participated in this survey

The main malaria vector is the mosquito. The current general warming phase began in the early 18th century, and temperatures in the northern hemisphere are now similar to those during the Middle Ages. It is thought economic activities have contributed to the trend and that it can be reversed. Climate's role in the spread of malaria may seem obvious. The spread of the disease relies upon Anopheline mosquitoes and a parasite pool among humans and animals. Temperature, rainfall and humidity all affect mosquito populations, as well as wind and sunlight. Increased rainfall and higher temperatures may provide more breeding pools for mosquitoes and quicken the development of mosquito larvae into adults. Mosquitoes are found throughout the world, except in areas permanently frozen - a testament to their ability to cope with different climatic conditions including extreme cold and heat. Studies showed they were able to survive temperatures below -10ºC for more than 9 days by remaining in an underground storm water drain and summer temperatures exceeding 55ºC by remaining indoors and hiding during the day - emerging after midnight.

1. The greatest impact upon the spread of malaria are economic activities and efforts to control the disease. While DDT finally eradicated malaria from Europe the disease had already been declining since the late 19th century. As Europe became wealthy and more developed, so the incidence of malaria declined. As the area of land under agricultural production increased, so the number of mosquito breeding pools declined. Improvements in technology meant fewer workers were required resulting in increased urban populations and reduced rural populations and the probability that the disease would spread was reduced. As people began to own more livestock mosquitoes had a greater number of potential animals upon which to feed reducing the spread still further. In addition, improved housing separated farmers from livestock and provided better protection from mosquitoes. Malaria is now a disease of the poor. Have you ever visited a country that still has malaria?

Yes I have visited a country where there was malaria and caught it.
56 votes
Yes I have visited a country where there was malaria but avoided getting it.
238 votes
No I have never visited a a country where there was malaria.
1,230 votes
I didn't know malaria was so widespread and may have visited a country where there was malaria
172 votes
Other (please specify)
7 votes
Not Applicable
627 votes
How has malaria impacted you?
  • Not at all
  • It hasnt!
  • n/a

2. My wife and I visited Tunisia in 1972, a country that had malarial mosquitoes even though we didn't know it at the time. This was our first introduction to mosquitoes and they seemed to like British blood (why wouldn't they) and the hotel upon a request would spray your room while you were having a meal in the dining room. The spray was very effective considering that the windows didn't have fly screens. The spray was DDT, a product that has been banned worldwide because of its impact on bird populations. DDT was cheap and very effective. Nothing has been produced to replace it that is also affordable. The impact on wildlife has since been proven to be less serious than originally thought and with climate change an effective spray is even more needed than before. Should the ban on DDT be rescinded?

DDT should be made available to help save human lives.
352 votes
DDT should continue to be banned and a replacement made a top priority.
633 votes
Wealthier nations should contribute more towards mosquito nets as has become popular in Canada. I will contribute towards that cause.
202 votes
Given the rise in international travel (pre and post COVID-19) and the ability of the mosquito to also travel internationally, malaria has the potential to become a global problem. I will share these concerns..
309 votes
Other (please specify)
27 votes
Not Applicable
927 votes
What are your thoughts about a return to using DDT.
  • Whatever works.
  • It must be used with care.
  • Work on effective vaccines and repellants instead.

3. There are persistent reports that China continues to produce and distribute DDT even though it signed the accord that banned it. It also has been accused of exporting DDT to 3rd world countries. Given how effective DDT is (when combined with the use of netting, standing water maintenance and other controls on larva) perhaps China should admit it produces DDT and share it more openly with the countries that need it.

DDT should remain banned and the global community should pressure China so stop its production.
657 votes
Given the lack of an effective substitute for DDT, China should be applauded and encouraged to continue its distribution of DDT
342 votes
Reliance on sprays should end and more passive measures such as mosquito nets should be the main weapon in the malaria fight.
321 votes
Other (please specify)
33 votes
Not Applicable
1,017 votes
What should we do about China's flaunting of the DDT ban it signed?
  • not a thing
  • Economic sanctions.

4. South Africa recently experienced a malaria epidemic after they removed the use of DDT and malaria returned after an absence of around 40 years. DDT was reintroduced and the result of was an 80% reduction in cases. The success of malaria was clearly more dependent on vector control than on rainfall. Malaria is a major determinant of poverty. Protocols that aim to limit CO2 emissions and economic growth, will not materially affect the spread of infectious diseases but will hamper the abilities of poor countries to cope with health crises. Man's activities have a far greater impact on the spread of malaria than climate, and more than the part that man's emissions may be playing in changing the climate. If we want to see successes in malaria control, reducing the levels of government bureaucracy is paramount. As in Europe and North America, the long run control of malaria and other infectious diseases depends on the ability of people to increase their wealth and prosperity. However, this will be hampered by attempts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and through proposed reliance on expensive and inefficient 'renewable' energy. As Bill Gates and others have discovered and are investing in, cheap energy from the likes of fusion nuclear technology is the key to prosperity in 3rd world countries and prosperity leads to better control of malaria. Should our focus be on wealth creation or climate change?

We should focus on reducing CO2 emissions even though it may make poor countries even poorer and less healthy.
249 votes
We should reduce CO2 emissions at a more gradual pace while helping provide cheap and clean energy to 3rd world countries to aid in their economic prosperity.
697 votes
We should just ignore 3rd world countries and prevent the spread of their diseases to our own country.
142 votes
We should encourage the very wealthy in North America and elsewhere to do more (10% of their considerable incomes) to help those less well off and do it voluntarily rather than through increased taxes and publish a list of those who do and those who don't.
354 votes
Other (please specify)
35 votes
Not Applicable
986 votes
How can we encourage the wealthy to give more?
  • That's the question for the ages.
  • charge them, increase taxes
  • more electric cars and more charging stations to encourage EV
09/27/2021 Health & Fitness 2377 30 By: DavKar
DavKar profile photo
By: DavKar
view all surveys