Rewards
Walmart logo
Amazon logo
PayPal logo
Amazon gift card
Take surveys and collect rewards from the industry-leading e-commerce website, Amazon.com, Via "amazon gift cards". The more you take or create survey, larger the amazon gift card you earn.

Results: Throw the first punch or turn the other cheek? Agree to disagree or continue to argue the point? Assertive or aggressive? Diplomatic or dogmatic? Nice guy in person but on social media - not so much? Let's explore the social media phenomenon..

Published on 01/07/2022
By: DavKar
2373
Technology
Do you join a fight at a bar even when it doesn't involve you at all? Do you throw punches whenever you disagree with something or someone, whether or not you know the context? My guess is no, you don't. Some people seem able to debate issues calmly and rationally when face to face but when on social media it's no holds barred. Are you a Jekyll and Hyde on social media?
1.
1.
In the physical world, we tend to be careful about how we interact. Most people aren't eager to engage in conflicts with random strangers. It's dangerous, subjects you to liability and injury, and may be a sign you're unhinged. Yet in the virtual world on social media, it seems people are itching for a fight, exchanging barbs and personal insults on Twitter and Facebook (and TW) making a big deal about an issue when they wouldn't normally do so in person.
I don't say anything on social media I wouldn't say in person.
48%
1097 votes
I am more diplomatic in person than I am on social media
10%
234 votes
Some people on social media have stupid ideas and I enjoy pointing that out to them.
8%
182 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
21 votes
Not Applicable
37%
850 votes
If you disagree with a point of view do you debate the point or argue the point.?
  • I enjoy a good debate - keeps the mind alert.
  • I don't use social media
  • I don't get involved in other people's conflicts. I font get involved with anyone's life and it is none of my business what they do.
2.
2.
A recent social media storm was based on a video clip showing a student wearing a MAGA hat and "smirking" in the face of a Vietnam war veteran. Twitter went nuts, people were divided with the left incensed on behalf of the veteran, the right defending the teen, and media generating outrage before much was understood about the situation. Later, a longer version of the video revealed the scene was more complex than it first seemed prompting the NY Times, and CNN to offer a "mea culpa" for jumping to conclusions.They suggested that reporters and everyone else, may need to slow down their response times on social media. Instead of jumping into the fray, they suggest, people need to stop and think before posting, and maybe even not post at all. Have you ever responded in haste based on a misapprehension?
I have made comments on social media that I regretted later when I found out I goofed.
10%
230 votes
I always sleep on an issue that upsets me before responding - things often look different in the morning.
20%
451 votes
There is so much misinformation on social media so I am free to add a little more.
8%
188 votes
Other (please specify)
2%
39 votes
Not Applicable
62%
1427 votes
Do you jump on the bandwagon on social media when you wouldn't otherwise?
  • I try not to and those that do are just bullies.
  • I do not condone misinformation given by social media on any level.
  • I don't like to comment on social media because I don't pay attention to anyone besides my family.
3.
3.
Resisting the lure of social media and the pressure to take sides may be a good idea, but abstaining altogether is difficult for many. The US Supreme Court has referred to social media as "the new public square" where in years gone by accused evildoers were pelted with "muck" by an unruly mob rather than have a trial in court. Rather than quit Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter, another option is to treat social media more like a place where as an observer you can pick up a lot of information while being more reticent to offer opinions and circumspect about posting. Becoming a "boulevardier" in other words. The boulevardier was a French 19th-century literary type who wandered Paris with no particular purpose other than to be in on the scene. Although they didn't appear to do anything besides hanging around, they watched what was happening and developed a deeper understanding of life and changing times. In other words refusing to be swayed by the moment while committing to investigate trends and events rather than ignoring them. The idea of doing nothing is not in vogue at the moment—we're forever optimizing our time and trying to seem extremely active. It may be more therapeutic to observe what goes on in social media without feeling compelled to immediately comment on it. Could you be a boulevardier?
I like the concept of being a boulevardier and observing, learning and commenting only after giving it more thought.
27%
616 votes
If i have something to say I say it. I don't have the time or inclination to be an observer.
12%
270 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
19 votes
There is so much misinformation already on social media so why not add to it?
8%
182 votes
Not Applicable
55%
1260 votes
When someone is under attack on social media do you tend to jump on the bandwagon "
  • yes
  • No, not unless I agree with one side or the other.
  • There are lots mean people on here, mostly women, who pick on people for not being a robot and thinking like them.
4.
4.
Since 2012, (Facebook's IPO) we've become more invested in internet culture, more outraged and engaged and hungry for the affirmations that social media provides. We want to be liked online and everyone else does too. We think tweeting is doing something, an expression of activism, and we're encouraged to believe engagement is evidence of success. So corporations and strangers seek our likes, retweets, insults, and quips even if sometimes they are negative and even make us sick. In our hyper-connected world, the risk of losing a connection to ourselves and the ability to think independently is greater than ever. It's possible that in vowing to think before we tweet, we may discover that, upon reflection, we don't really have anything of value to add. If enough people do this, there might come a day when the public square falls silent. While unlikely, if it were to happen nothing vital will be lost. Either we don't need social media after all, or we can decide to speak only about what matters and only when we know enough about it to opine. We can also avoid attacks on individuals while retaining the right to challenge ideas and argue points of view. Can we at least commit to being more kind and empathetic to each other on social media starting with this TW forum?
There are some mean people making nasty comments directed at specific people on social media. I can and will control what I say and trust that nothing nasty will come my way.
19%
448 votes
I never make personal comments on social media, just general ones and wish everyone would do the same.
27%
616 votes
If I have something to say I say it. I can't control what is said about me so why censor myself?
7%
154 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
23 votes
Not Applicable
51%
1164 votes
Do you check to see what or if others on social media think of you?
  • I am not that vain and don't care what strangers say about me.
  • No
  • Nope.
COMMENTS