Results: Photoshopping Babies?
1.
1.
A Reddit poster recently uploaded a photo of a Huggies ad she came across, in which she thought the baby's thighs looked unnatural. Did you hear about this? Yes
8%
•
153 votes
No
81%
•
1588 votes
Undecided
3%
•
61 votes
Not Applicable
8%
•
158 votes
2.
2.
Here is the photo. Melody, the mother of an 11-month-old, feels like the baby's thighs do not look natural, as if they have been digitally altered, or slimmed. What do you think?
Those thighs have definitely been altered!
20%
•
400 votes
They do look odd, but I'm not certain.
25%
•
489 votes
I do not think they have been filtered.
7%
•
144 votes
I really don't know.
32%
•
623 votes
n/a
15%
•
285 votes
Other (please specify)
1%
•
19 votes
| Other Answers | Percentage | Votes |
| 0.31% | 6 | |
| who cares | 0.10% | 2 |
| who cares? good lord,get a life | 0.05% | 1 |
| who cares really | 0.05% | 1 |
| could be a mannequin and not real thighs. looks older than a baby. | 0.05% | 1 |
| i would hope that they are natural. one should celebrate the fact that we are all unique. | 0.05% | 1 |
| looks likd a 7 year old | 0.05% | 1 |
| doesn't look like a baby to me | 0.05% | 1 |
| it looks lika an older taller child, not a baby. | 0.05% | 1 |
| who cares it's only an advertisement for diapers. | 0.05% | 1 |
| dont really care | 0.05% | 1 |
| omg people will complain about everything | 0.05% | 1 |
| deeznuts | 0.05% | 1 |
3.
3.
Huggies responded to this situation by saying they never alter the bodies of the children they use, and that they really strive to find variety in the kids that they use. Do you believe them? Yes
22%
•
426 votes
No
22%
•
436 votes
Undecided
40%
•
779 votes
Not Applicable
16%
•
319 votes
4.
4.
Would you boycott Huggies over this? Yes
5%
•
99 votes
No
52%
•
1023 votes
Undecided
10%
•
205 votes
Not Applicable
32%
•
633 votes
Comments